no additional logic that goes beyond relational lookups and data filtering, which are a core feature) Ninox might be worth a look. If you are looking for an easy way to implement a relational database with little to no logic (i.e. Would love to hear more about it on the show. Probably not as good as Airtable or similar if you need a collaborative database but for my use it’s perfect. My only regret is that I didn’t discover it years earlier. It is very reasonably priced, there is an active forum of users, a single developer who is very responsive, great documentation, optional database encryption, JavaScript support and an iOS app with iCloud syncing.
#Ninox database examples mac
It’s an attractive, actively-developed mac database app built on top of SQLite that is powerful and flexible.
#Ninox database examples trial
When I finally downloaded the trial version I was surprised to see that it was exactly what was after. I had written off Tap Forms many times because of the name-after all, I wanted a database and not a form application. Take a look if you’re curious and/or a tool junkie like me.I’ve found Airtable to be useful for simple databases where sharing is required, or for collecting survey responses from large numbers of people.įor my main use case of collecting confidential patient information for future reference, Airtable or its competitors are obviously not suitable.
#Ninox database examples free
They have a 30 day free trial and their presets do a decent job of showcasing a lot of the functionality. So I’m curious what other Fibery users might think of it. I’d say Ninox is a lot closer to Fibery in some respects than some of the other apps it’s compared to.
It’s also a little surprising to me that it doesn’t come up in regular conversation of Fibery competitors/comparisons, whereas Notion, Airtable, and others do. As well as a sort of “parallel universe” view of what Fibery might be like if it was started in an earlier web era (even though they just rolled out a design overhaul to version 3.0 it still feels a bit outdated to me). But it’s interesting to see how one tool chose to approach these things, and may even be helpful for reference, or avoiding some of the mistakes they made.Īnyway, I still much prefer Fibery, but this is an interesting tool to look at for possible inspiration on future Fibery features and improvements. Most of this stuff is probably coming to Fibery at some point. There are lots of other niceties and features I could mention, saved state of view for tables in left navigation, some of the handling of slide-in tabs, straightforward record navigation and manipulation (next/previous buttons, etc.), as well as various automation functions and integrations. Or show the average number of tasks completed per week within your Project entity. Imagine being able to chart the price of offers over time on one particular house, for example (remember, I work in real estate ). Basically a much stronger ability to lay out and differentiate your entity views.Īlso of great interest is the ability to add Views and charts to individual entity layouts. Additionally you can add some basic formatting to entity layouts, including separators, free text with fairly sophisticated styling options (alignment, colors, borders), and more. I would definitely find this helpful in Fibery. Perhaps more notably Tabs are also available on “entity” views, so you can arrange fields into tabs for better organization. This is basically how ClickUp works too, and it’s something I like and have already requested before. The concept of UI “Tabs” is used across much of the app, so you can create views of a table that are tabs, the equivalent of having a set of Fibery views all accessible from a single item in the main menu, and switched between using tabs in the content view. Where Ninox shines is in its representations and interaction with the data, especially at an “entity” level. So it’s less flexible than Fibery in that respect to be sure. It also doesn’t use the “app” concept, but you can link together tables within a database in fairly well-represented ways. Ninox focuses entirely on databases, there are no “documents” at all, and no whiteboards.
0 kommentar(er)
